EVE Search - Territorial Alliance Map - Latest Update 2006.04.27

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Territorial Alliance Map - Latest Update 2006.04.27

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]


Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 25 post(s)
Ichabod Crane	Posted - 2006.06.19 15:58:00 - [1] Edited by: Ichabod Crane on 19/06/2006 16:01:25 Originally by: The Mittani Originally by: Ziriam syndicate is not all goons.. 3fa controls south syndicate and Enigma allaince is holding the center of syndicate while goons and 3fa fight us for territorial control. plz fix accordingly thanx. ziriam [SP4NK]Ceo. ENIGMA has, until this post, represented themselves purely as a pirate alliance, rather than a territory-holding entity. They do not make any particular efforts to defend their homebase of V4-L0X (which is more of a refueling/rearming stop conveniently located between two Syndicate chokepoints than a 'base'), and have thus far only engaged in the usual sort of piracy and gatecamping we expect throughout the Syndicate area, rather than concentrating on any particular zone to defend. I would suggest that this announcement be disregarded, particularly because the ENIGMA representative has not even staked a claim to a particular constellation, nor have their actions demonstrated a desire to defend much of anything. Besides, at a fundamental level I can't bring myself to believe that CRWS would ever be content to claim and defend space. The Mittani, Official GoonSwarm Director-type Guy(tm) From what I understand ENIGMA also have pilots in UM-Q7F and a few other systems in the DS-M4Q constellation so they definately live there, but share the constellation with other neutral corps. Aside from the odd camp in MHC and raiding parties into other areas they certainly dont seem to control the area, at least in my opinion. Also I'd like to point out an error or two on the map: the left tip of goonswarm space in syndicate (above 3FA space) overlaps the 2-M6DE and DS-M4Q constellations. 3FA currently controls 2-M6DE with our pilots actively basing themselves out of the area, with occasional enemy raids and the odd hostile traveller to reblier/MHC. Also to my knowledge Goonswarm has never made a claim on DS-M4Q, so that could do with fixing. -
Ichabod Crane	Posted - 2006.07.04 19:44:00 - [2] Originally by: Ziriam YO syndicate is a warzone!!! plz correct it. Syndicate is not a warzone, nor has it been for many months There is always fighting here in Syndicate but no more than any other 0.0 region. IMO to be marked as a warzone it really would need two or more factions fighting each other for supremacy, and unless I am mistaken, ENIGMA does not claim or contest any other claim in this region -
Ichabod Crane	Posted - 2006.07.05 10:57:00 - [3] I never denied that there was fighting there, but without anyone actually contesting it, it just doesnt justify a warzone marker IMO. Places like pure blind and providence arent peaceful simply because they dont have a warzone marker you know Syndicate already has a reputation as a violent and lawless region, it doesnt need some fancy sign to show that tbh -
Ichabod Crane Gallente LFC 3rd Front Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.02 18:51:00 - [4] Originally by: Nalrath Tolahnia Originally by: TuRtLe HeAd RISE have top half of syndicate Thats actually a misconception because of the way the map displays claims, Syndicate's constellations on a 2D prospective criss-cross all over the place, RISE only claims those syndicate Constellations situated behind the Chokepoint C0T-77 (IE those syndicate constellations only accessible via the Outer Ring Entry Point), those being (if memory recalls) the 6-V/QS/SKX constellations, what would be seen on the map as Northern/Southern/Central syndicate has nothing to do with us, its just hard to get an accurate representation of that on the map in 2D form (josh does a good job showing claims in syndicate, considering its a really messy Region in 2D form). Best Regards, Nal Agree. Same with JQV/MK7 that overlaps northern solitude and Y4Y which overlaps TA-A7V. Its not possible to get a completely accurate map in 2D but it more or less shows the information correctly. Originally by: TuRtLe HeAd The only area of contest in Syndicate is 1 System out of a region. It hardly constitutes the lower end. Maybe a Side note on the legend stating S-U8A4 is contested, because the rest of syndicate is as free as a bird. We Sure as hell never see any action in the lower half of syndicate and we've been living in 7 systems for the last Year or so. I dont know which seven systems you are living in, but they certainly arent in lower syndicate Theres plenty of fighting between five different alliances in LS atm, so how you are unaware of any 'action' there is beyond me. -
Ichabod Crane Gallente LFC 3rd Front Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.04 15:33:00 - [5] Originally by: Himo Amasacia Originally by: Ichabod Crane I dont know which seven systems you are living in, but they certainly arent in lower syndicate Theres plenty of fighting between five different alliances in LS atm, so how you are unaware of any 'action' there is beyond me. Apocalypse Enterprises live in KFR-ZE mostly FYI. Aha. KFR-ZE is in northern syndicate on the solitude border, its generally recognised by its inhabitants that Lower-Syndicate is all systems between Y9G-KS (the southern border to solitude) 6-CZ49 (the eastern border) and MHC-R3 (the northern most border system of LS) Of course those boundaries are open to individual perceptions. But at any rate, as far as I am aware neither Goonswarm nor BoB or any other LS alliance with the possible exception of Black Reign Syndicate are active in the northern end of Syndicate. -
Ichabod Crane Gallente LFC 3rd Front Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.06 19:39:00 - [6] Edited by: Ichabod Crane on 06/08/2006 19:39:13 Yes because we all know having system sovereignty over an area is unquestionable evidence of its control -
Ichabod Crane Gallente LFC 3rd Front Alliance	Posted - 2006.08.12 16:24:00 - [7] Originally by: TuRtLe HeAd Originally by: DB Preacher Too many alliances, too little space in Syndicate. Just mark it as Multi-factional as it has no overall controllers. dbp Thank you. That would be fine if every alliance in syndicate was making a terratorial claim. But there are only three that do so and in seperate areas, the map can accomodate that as it has done in the past. -

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.